|
Computer Assisted Instruction (CAI) is a legitimate method of instruction,
equal to other traditional types of teaching in terms of learning and
time involvement (Jelovsek & Adebonojo, 1993). Kohl & Su (1995)
reported two studies that showed small but significant achievement gains
in the average examination scores of CAI classes as compared to traditional
classes. In six studies, retention of the information showed no significant
difference between CAI and conventional methods of instruction. The time
required to learn from CAI compared to conventional methods also was not
significantly different.
The
past decade has seen a growth in the number and quality of available instructional
software packages for nursing education, which have many advantages: flexible,
self-paced, easily monitored and updated, and provide feedback on progress.
CAI is useful in teaching decision making; developed on a case simulation
approach, it can assist the student in the steps of the nursing process.
The findings of a study conducted at the University of Texas Health Science
Center in San Antonio showed that CAI was at least equivalent to the traditional
nursing process strategy in terms of critical thinking outcomes and was
demonstrated to have some advantages over traditional nursing process
in terms of student satisfaction and time efficiency, which could make
it a superior strategy. Another study found that students using computer
based instruction had higher examination averages and they had more positive
attitudes toward their instructional method than conventionally taught
students (Saucier, Stevens, & Williams, 2000).
Some faculty members may find it hard to locate good case materials and
others are not sure how to go about teaching a case study. A potential
fear is that the discussion will degenerate into a "pointless exchange
of personal opinions." Dowd and Davidhizar (1999) suggest that this
can be prevented by careful case preparation:
- Review
the problem-solving objectives for the class session.
- Prepare
the materials the students will read.
- Consider
critical issues and topics yet to be covered.
- Make
notes after each class session, and use them to review.
- Hypothesize
how the case will develop.
- Consider
each student's background and experiences.
- Considering
your personal attitude toward the case study issue to prevent biases
from emerging.
- Developing
opening comments and closing summaries for each case.
Dowd and
Davidhizar (1999) warn that instructors must be willing to relinquish
control over the learning process when they implement student-centered
strategies like the case study approach. Both successes and failures will
occur; both should be used as feedback in developing subsequent learning
experiences. The danger when student-centered approaches fail is that
instructors quickly return to more familiar teacher-centered approaches
such as lecturing. Dowd and Davidhizar see this as "a retreat to
surface rather than deep learning."
Students in both traditional classroom settings and online courses frequently
request access to CAI programs from home. Recently, CAI software vendors
have added web-based delivery options, which facilitate use in online
courses. Other vendors have student pricing for individual programs available
through college bookstores. Here are some examples:
Maybe you
want to develop your own computer assisted instruction from one of your
favorite case studies. Here are some simple steps from Danette Wood, RN,
MSN, EdD, CCRN, to help you design the CAI:
- Write
goals and objectives.
- Frame
the story and develop the patient scenario storyboard or script.
- A storyboard
provides sketches of frames or scenes, with accompanying information
regarding dialog, setting, and or transitions. The strength of the
storyboard lies in its ability to give a visual representation or
overview of what the scene should look like (usually through cartoon
or stick figure diagrams). To see an example of a storyboards click
here. To print out a blank storyboard
click here.
- The
script is a paper version or outline of your video. It contains dialog
characters, plot, and can be broken down into parts called, scenes
or acts. To see an example of a script click here.
To print out a blank script click here.
- Answer:
Who, What, When, Where, How and Why?
- Develop
critical thinking questions, include:
- Correct
answer with rationale.
- Incorrect
answers with rationale.
- Include
copyright statement
- The
United States copyright law protects this product. Copyright law
(17 USC section 117) protects computer software and duplication
or distribution of copyrighted software violates the law.
- Include
disclaimer:
- Nursing
is a constantly changing field. New research has increased nursing
knowledge and changes in nursing practice occur daily. Although
attempts have been made to consistently update and provide the newest
and most current information, readers must be advised that errors
may occur. The information contained in this scenario is a synopsis
of ideas from the literature. The recommendations included in the
scenario about the care of patients are opinions formed from this
information. The author assumes no responsibility or liability.
Before acting on any of these suggestions, the reader should obtain
and review detailed current information about these different treatments
and medications.
- Remember
the following tips:
- Content
(function) is more important than style (fashion).
- Beware
of bells and whistles:
- Design
for the lowest common denominator - students often do not have
the latest technology and may be connecting to the Internet
with dial up connections rather than DSL or cable.
- Large
images and audio files may take a long time to load and may
frustrate the end user.
(For more
information contact Education Support Services, Danette Wood, PO Box
1517, Statesboro, Georgia 30459 or dmwood@pineland.net)
After completing
this module, you will have the basic tools you need to create all of the
different components: scenario, interactive questions, post test, etc.
References:
- Dowd,
S.B., & Davidhizar, R. (1999). Using Case Studies to Teach Clinical
Problem-Solving. Nurse Educator, 24(5), pp 42-46.
- Jelovsek,F.
R., & Abebonojo, L. (1993). Learning principles as applied to computer-assisted
instruction. MD Computing, 10, 165-172.
- Kohl,
J.E. & Su, M.C. (1995). Computer Assisted Instruction: Implications
for Achievement and Critical Thinking. University of Maryland. [Available
Online: http://www.nursing.umaryland.edu/students/~jkohl/cai.htm]
- Saucier,
B.L.; Stevens, K.R.; Williams, G.B. (2000). Critical Thinking Outcomes
of Computer-Assisted Instruction versus Written Nursing Process. Nursing
and Health Care Perspectives, 21(5), pp 240-246.
- Wood,
N. (Undated). Develop Course Specific Interactive Software: Techniques
for Development of Computer Assisted Instruction. Presentation handout.
|